The Tapping Evidence Base
PTSD & Trauma

EMDR v. other psychological therapies for PTSD: a systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis

Wright, S., Karyotaki, E., Cuijpers, P., et al. Β· Psychological Medicine Β· 2024

Meta-analysisπŸ‘₯ 346 participantsβš–οΈ vs. EMDR vs relaxation therapy, EFT, trauma-focused CBT, and REM-desensitization (pooled as 'other psychological treatments')Moderate rigorβœ“ Source-checked
In plain English. This meta-analysis compared EMDR against a mix of other PTSD treatments (one of which was EFT, though EFT itself is not broken out separately) and found EMDR was not significantly better or worse overall. Because EFT is lumped in with several other therapies rather than analyzed on its own, this study offers only indirect and limited insight into EFT specifically.

What they found

8
studies pooled and re-analyzed

One-stage individual participant data meta-analysis found no significant difference between EMDR and other psychological treatments (including EFT as one comparator) in reducing PTSD symptom severity, achieving response, remission, or dropout rates.

How the study worked

Who took partadults with above-threshold baseline PTSD symptoms, pooled across 8 of 15 eligible RCTs (n=346)
What they didThis meta-analysis statistically pooled the results of many earlier studies to estimate an overall effect.
Compared withEMDR vs relaxation therapy, EFT, trauma-focused CBT, and REM-desensitization (pooled as 'other psychological treatments')
Measured withPTSD symptom severity, treatment response, PTSD remission, treatment dropout

⭐ Why this study matters

Individual participant data meta-analysis is about as rigorous as psychotherapy comparison research gets β€” pooling raw patient-level data across 8 trials rather than just summary statistics β€” so finding no significant difference between EMDR and this basket of alternatives, EFT included, is a genuinely serious data point, not a soft claim.

πŸ’‘ Where this could help

Imagine a PTSD patient told EMDR isn't available in their area, wondering whether any of the alternatives are worth pursuing. Unlike EMDR, tapping doesn't require a specially trained clinician to deliver it β€” it can be self-taught and practiced independently β€” so if future analyses can pull EFT out of this therapy-mix and show it holds its own on its own merits, it could give patients a genuine, evidence-backed option even where no EMDR-trained therapist is available at all.

πŸ”¬ What to study next

Since EFT was pooled here inside a broader 'other therapies' bucket, the obvious next step is extracting it as its own arm across these same patient-level datasets to see whether it holds up independently against EMDR rather than being diluted alongside relaxation therapy. Layering objective PTSD biomarkers β€” HRV, cortisol reactivity to trauma-cue exposure, or fMRI amygdala/prefrontal connectivity β€” into a head-to-head EFT-vs-EMDR individual participant data analysis would show whether the two therapies converge on the same physiological endpoint, not just similar symptom scores.

The full record

DesignMeta-analysis
Participants346 people
Populationadults with above-threshold baseline PTSD symptoms, pooled across 8 of 15 eligible RCTs
Comparison groupEMDR vs relaxation therapy, EFT, trauma-focused CBT, and REM-desensitization (pooled as 'other psychological treatments')
Outcome measuresPTSD symptom severity, treatment response, PTSD remission, treatment dropout
JournalPsychological Medicine
Year2024
LanguageEnglish
MethodEFT / tapping
Publication typeReview or meta-analysis
Verificationβœ“ Confirmed against the primary source
Verification note. Full PubMed abstract confirms every detail: 15 eligible RCTs identified, 8 of 15 included in the IPDMA (346 patients); comparator treatments were 'relaxation therapy, emotional freedom technique, trauma-focused cognitive behavioral psychotherapies, and REM-desensitization'; one-stage IPDMA found no significant difference in symptom severity (beta=-0.24), response (beta=0.86), remission (beta=1.05), or dropout (beta=-0.25). Record's n_studies=8, n=346, beta=-0.24, and EFT's inclusion as a pooled comparator are all confirmed verbatim.

Read the original study β†’

Cite this study

APA

Wright, S., Karyotaki, E., Cuijpers, P., & et al. (2024). EMDR v. other psychological therapies for PTSD: a systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis. Psychological Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291723003446

This record is part of the Tapping Evidence Base β€” an openly-sourced, fully-referenced directory of the research on EFT/tapping. Explore more studies on PTSD & Trauma

Share this study

A ready-made graphic β€” right-click or long-press to save the image.

Show shareable card
THE TAPPING EVIDENCE BASE PTSD & Trauma 8 studies pooled WHAT THEY FOUND One-stage individual participant data meta-analysis found no significant differencebetween EMDR and other… Meta-analysis Β· 346 participants Wright Β· 2024 Β· evidence.thetappingsolution.com