Pignotti, M., Thayer, B. Β· Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training Β· 2009
The authors argue that Feinstein's earlier review of energy psychology evidence omitted studies that did not confirm proponents' claims, lacked explicit inclusion/exclusion criteria, mischaracterized one study as a randomized clinical trial, and did not disclose an EP-related business interest.
| Design | Review |
|---|---|
| Population | critical commentary on Feinstein's 2008 evidence review |
| Journal | Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training |
| Year | 2009 |
| Country | United States |
| Language | English |
| Method | EFT / tapping |
| Publication type | Review or meta-analysis |
| Verification | β Confirmed against the primary source |
Pignotti, M., & Thayer, B. (2009). Some comments on "Energy psychology: A review of the evidence." Premature conclusions based on incomplete evidence?. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016027
This record is part of the Tapping Evidence Base β an openly-sourced, fully-referenced directory of the research on EFT/tapping. Explore more studies on How It Works (Biology)
A ready-made graphic β right-click or long-press to save the image.