The Tapping Evidence Base
How It Works (Biology) · Multiple Conditions

Thought Field Therapy Voice Technology vs. Random Meridian Point Sequences: A Single-blind Controlled Experiment

Pignotti, M. · Scientific Review of Mental Health Practice · 2005

Controlled trial👥 66 participants⚖️ vs. random meridian point tapping sequenceModerate rigor✓ Source-checked📍 United States
In plain English. This controlled experiment tested a proprietary tapping-sequencing method, Thought Field Therapy Voice Technology, against tapping on a randomly chosen sequence of the same points, in 66 adults. Both groups reported almost identical results, 97% said their distress fully went away, with no statistical difference between the specific 'diagnosed' sequence and a random one. This is a genuine null result: it suggests the particular point sequence claimed by this proprietary method wasn't what drove the improvement, and the study's authors raised ethical questions about keeping such sequences as trade secrets.

What they found

66
people took part

In a single-blind quasi-random trial, 66 participants were split between Thought Field Therapy Voice Technology (n=33) and a randomly-sequenced tapping control (n=33); 97% of participants in both groups reported complete elimination of subjective emotional distress, and a two-way mixed ANOVA found no significant difference between groups.

How the study worked

Who took partadults with self-reported emotional distress (n=66)
What they didIn a controlled trial, a tapping group was compared against a separate comparison group.
Compared withrandom meridian point tapping sequence
Measured withsubjective units of distress (self-report)

The full record

DesignControlled trial
Participants66 people
Populationadults with self-reported emotional distress
Comparison grouprandom meridian point tapping sequence
Outcome measuressubjective units of distress (self-report)
JournalScientific Review of Mental Health Practice
Year2005
CountryUnited States
LanguageEnglish
MethodThought Field Therapy (related tapping method)
Publication typeStudy / trial
Verification✓ Confirmed against the primary source

Read the original study →

Cite this study

APA

Pignotti, M. (2005). Thought Field Therapy Voice Technology vs. Random Meridian Point Sequences: A Single-blind Controlled Experiment. Scientific Review of Mental Health Practice.

This record is part of the Tapping Evidence Base — an openly-sourced, fully-referenced directory of the research on EFT/tapping. Explore more studies on How It Works (Biology)

Share this study

A ready-made graphic — right-click or long-press to save the image.

Show shareable card
THE TAPPING EVIDENCE BASE How It Works (Biology) 66 participants WHAT THEY FOUND In a single-blind quasi-random trial, 66participants were split between ThoughtField Therapy Voice Technology… Controlled trial · 66 participants Pignotti · 2005 · evidence.thetappingsolution.com