Pasahow, R. · Energy Psychology Journal · 2010
The paper argues that the Waite and Holder (2003) study, which used two sham-treatment groups and a control group and was cited by APA's Continuing Education Committee as evidence against EFT, contained numerous statistical omissions, incorrect application of EFT procedures, and insufficient treatment time, precluding meaningful conclusions.
| Design | Review |
|---|---|
| Population | methodological critique of a prior EFT sham-treatment study |
| Outcome measures | fear ratings |
| Journal | Energy Psychology Journal |
| Year | 2010 |
| Country | United States |
| Language | English |
| Method | EFT / Tapping |
| Publication type | Review or meta-analysis |
| Verification | ✓ Confirmed against the primary source |
Pasahow, R. (2010). Methodological problems in Waite and Holder (2003) preclude meaningful interpretations about Emotional Freedom Techniques (EFT). Energy Psychology Journal. https://doi.org/10.9769/EPJ.2010.2.2.RP
This record is part of the Tapping Evidence Base — an openly-sourced, fully-referenced directory of the research on EFT/Tapping. Explore more studies on Phobias · How It Works (Biology)
A ready-made graphic — right-click or long-press to save the image.