The Tapping Evidence Base
Multiple Conditions Β· Anxiety Β· Depression

The effectiveness of psychological support interventions for those exposed to mass infectious disease outbreaks: a systematic review

Doherty, A., Benedetto, V., Harris, C. Β· BMC Psychiatry Β· 2021

Systematic reviewπŸ“š 22 studies reviewedβš–οΈ vs. varied (no intervention, usual care, and other active interventions)Moderate rigorβœ“ Source-checkedπŸ“ United Kingdom
In plain English. This review pooled 22 randomized trials of psychological support during infectious disease outbreaks, of which only one used EFT specifically (most used CBT, online counselling, or other approaches). Overall, these interventions as a group significantly reduced depression and anxiety, but the review found high risk of bias and heterogeneity across the studies, so EFT's individual contribution can't be assessed from this analysis.

What they found

22
studies reviewed

Across 22 included RCTs (one using EFT specifically), meta-analyses found a significant benefit for managing depression and anxiety, while the effect on stress was equivocal (SMD 0.16, 95% CI -0.19 to 0.51).

How the study worked

Who took partgeneral population and healthcare workers exposed to mass infectious disease outbreaks
What they didThis systematic review gathered and appraised the body of published studies against a defined method.
Compared withvaried (no intervention, usual care, and other active interventions)
Measured withdepression measures, anxiety measures, stress measures

πŸ’‘ Where this could help

Picture the next pandemic: healthcare workers running on fumes, and millions of people stuck at home with no therapist available and clinics overwhelmed. If a dedicated tool like tapping proves out in this setting, it could be one of the few interventions that scales to a population-wide mental health crisis β€” something people learn once, from a video or app, and then use themselves indefinitely, without needing a single additional clinician.

πŸ”¬ What to study next

Because only one of the 22 trials in this review actually used EFT, the more useful next step is a dedicated tapping trial embedded in a real outbreak response, rather than folding it into a review of 22 different interventions. Pairing self-report stress measures with cortisol, heart-rate variability, or actigraphy-tracked sleep would help clarify whether the equivocal stress finding here reflects tapping specifically or is just diluted by averaging across such a varied set of approaches β€” and testing app or video delivery would matter given how isolated people are during a pandemic.

The full record

DesignSystematic review
Participants22 studies pooled
Populationgeneral population and healthcare workers exposed to mass infectious disease outbreaks
Comparison groupvaried (no intervention, usual care, and other active interventions)
Outcome measuresdepression measures, anxiety measures, stress measures
JournalBMC Psychiatry
Year2021
CountryUnited Kingdom
LanguageEnglish
MethodEFT / tapping
Publication typeReview or meta-analysis
Verificationβœ“ Confirmed against the primary source

Read the original study β†’

Cite this study

APA

Doherty, A., Benedetto, V., & Harris, C. (2021). The effectiveness of psychological support interventions for those exposed to mass infectious disease outbreaks: a systematic review. BMC Psychiatry. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-021-03602-7

This record is part of the Tapping Evidence Base β€” an openly-sourced, fully-referenced directory of the research on EFT/tapping. Explore more studies on Anxiety Β· Depression

Share this study

A ready-made graphic β€” right-click or long-press to save the image.

Show shareable card
THE TAPPING EVIDENCE BASE Multiple Conditions 22 studies pooled WHAT THEY FOUND Across 22 included RCTs (one using EFTspecifically), meta-analyses found asignificant benefit for managing… Systematic review Β· 22 studies Doherty Β· 2021 Β· evidence.thetappingsolution.com