Church, D., Piña, O., Reategui, C., Brooks, A. · 2012
The primary paper (Church, Piña, Reategui & Brooks, 'Single-Session Reduction of the Intensity of Traumatic Memories in Abused Adolescents After EFT: A Randomized Controlled Pilot Study,' Traumatology 18(3):73-79, 2012) reports raw means and F-statistics, not Cohen's d. Verbatim from its Table 1 (30-day follow-up, IES Total): control group pre 32.00±4.82 to post 31.38±3.84 versus experimental group pre 36.38±4.74 to post 3.38±2.60, F(1,14)=240.68, p<.001; intrusive-memories subscale F(1,14)=36.25, p<.001; avoidance subscale F(1,14)=159.30, p<.001. Independently recalculating Cohen's d from these posttest between-group means/SDs using a standard pooled-SD formula yields d≈8.5 (total), d≈5.1 (intrusive memories), d≈6.9 (avoidance) — in the same order of magnitude as the previously recorded 8.07/3.95/6.89 (from Sebastian & Nelms 2017's table) but not numerically identical, consistent with a legitimate but source-derived (not author-stated) calculation using a possibly different convention.
Think of a teenage boy in an institutional setting, carrying the weight of abuse with few people trained to help him process it. If this very large effect is confirmed by more research, it points toward a single session teaching a skill he can then use on his own — meaningful relief for a population that institutional systems often struggle to reach with sustained, staff-intensive therapy.
Given how large this single-session effect appears, the priority is simply replication at scale with objective corroboration — cortisol or HRV measured before and after the single session, plus a longer follow-up than 30 days, in a larger sample of institutionalized or abused adolescents — to see whether an effect this dramatic and this rapid holds up outside a very small pilot. If it does, it would be worth testing whether facility staff, not just trained clinicians, can deliver the single session effectively.
| Design | Randomized trial |
|---|---|
| Participants | 16 people |
| Population | institutionalized male juveniles, physically/psychologically abused |
| Comparison group | waitlist |
| Effect size | Cohen's d (IES total, derived) = 8.07 (95% CI 5.11-11.03) — on PTSD/trauma symptoms, EFT vs waitlist (between-group, posttest); this is a value derived/calculated by the secondary meta-analysis source (Sebastian & Nelms 2017) from the primary paper's raw means/SDs — the primary paper itself reports only F-statistics, not a Cohen's d |
| Outcome measures | SUDS, IES |
| Journal | Original publication venue not confirmed (indexed via Sebastian & Nelms 2017 Table 1/2) |
| Year | 2012 |
| Country | United States |
| Language | English |
| Method | EFT / tapping |
| Publication type | Study / trial |
| Verification | ✓ Confirmed against the primary source |
Church, D., Piña, O., Reategui, C., & Brooks, A. (2012). PTSD trial in institutionalized abused male juveniles (as tabulated in Sebastian & Nelms 2017). https://doi.org/10.1177/1534765611426788
This record is part of the Tapping Evidence Base — an openly-sourced, fully-referenced directory of the research on EFT/tapping. Explore more studies on PTSD & Trauma · Trauma (other)
A ready-made graphic — right-click or long-press to save the image.