The Tapping Evidence Base
Anxiety

Preliminary report of the first large-scale study of energy psychology

Andrade, J., Feinstein, D. Β· Energy Psychology Interactive: Rapid Interventions for Lasting Change (Innersource) Β· 2004

Controlled trialπŸ‘₯ 5000 participantsβš–οΈ vs. standard protocol (cognitive behavior therapy with anti-anxiety medication as needed)Preliminaryβœ“ Source-checkedπŸ“ Argentina/Uruguay
In plain English. Across 11 clinics in Argentina and Uruguay, 5,000 anxiety patients over five and a half years were randomly given either standard cognitive behavioral therapy with medication, or acupoint tapping without medication, with raters blind to which treatment each patient got. Nine in ten tapping patients improved, versus about six in ten in the CBT group, and tapping patients also needed far fewer sessions on average (three versus fifteen) to get there. This is the largest sample size in the entire EFT literature, but the authors themselves are candid that it was an informal, in-house clinic tracking exercise never submitted for peer review, with looser record-keeping than a formal trial - so its size should be weighed against that limitation.

What they found

5000
people took part

Improvement was found in 90% of the acupoint tapping group versus 63% of the CBT group, with complete symptom relief in 76% of the tapping group versus 51% of the CBT group; one-year follow-up projected 78% sustained benefit for tapping versus 69% for CBT.

How the study worked

Who took partanxiety patients across 11 allied clinics in Argentina and Uruguay, tracked over 5.5 years (n=5000)
What they didIn a controlled trial, a tapping group was compared against a separate comparison group.
Compared withstandard protocol (cognitive behavior therapy with anti-anxiety medication as needed)
Measured withrater-assessed clinical improvement and complete symptom relief

πŸ’‘ Where this could help

If findings like these hold up in larger trials, the promise is simple: a low-cost, self-administered tool that could reach people struggling with anxiety who can't easily access traditional care β€” at home, between appointments, or where there aren't enough clinicians to go around.

πŸ”¬ What to study next

The natural next step: longer-term follow-up to see how durable the benefit is, and an active ('sham tapping') control to isolate what's doing the work.

The full record

DesignControlled trial
Participants5000 people
Populationanxiety patients across 11 allied clinics in Argentina and Uruguay, tracked over 5.5 years
Comparison groupstandard protocol (cognitive behavior therapy with anti-anxiety medication as needed)
Outcome measuresrater-assessed clinical improvement and complete symptom relief
JournalEnergy Psychology Interactive: Rapid Interventions for Lasting Change (Innersource)
Year2004
CountryArgentina/Uruguay
LanguageEnglish
MethodThought Field Therapy (related tapping method)
Publication typeStudy / trial
Verificationβœ“ Confirmed against the primary source

Read the original study β†’

Cite this study

APA

Andrade, J., & Feinstein, D. (2004). Preliminary report of the first large-scale study of energy psychology. Energy Psychology Interactive: Rapid Interventions for Lasting Change (Innersource).

This record is part of the Tapping Evidence Base β€” an openly-sourced, fully-referenced directory of the research on EFT/tapping. Explore more studies on Anxiety

Share this study

A ready-made graphic β€” right-click or long-press to save the image.

Show shareable card
THE TAPPING EVIDENCE BASE Anxiety 5000 participants WHAT THEY FOUND Improvement was found in 90% of the acupointtapping group versus 63% of the CBT group,with complete symptom relief… Controlled trial Β· 5000 participants Andrade Β· 2004 Β· evidence.thetappingsolution.com