The Tapping Evidence Base

Tapping for Athletic Performance

The complete published evidence on Tapping for athletic performance — every study we could find, in plain English, with the results laid out in full.

8studies
4randomized trials
1 meta-analyses / reviews
80people studied
Solid evidenceMultiple randomized controlled trials point the same direction, with more studies published every year.

🖨️ Print the one-page summary for your doctor →

The short version. Small randomized trials report better performance under pressure after Tapping, including a 20.8% improvement in basketball free-throw accuracy versus placebo (Church 2010). It's the youngest evidence base on the site and it's growing; the studies are below.

Evidence at a glance

The whole athletic performance picture in one row, and every study's effect size on one scale.

8studies total
4randomized trials
1meta-analyses
80people studied
typical effect
Beyond the lab — real-world use

What we see outside the studies

Separate from the peer-reviewed research above, here's Tapping for athletic performance as it plays out in everyday use inside The Tapping Solution app. This is observational, self-reported, and uncontrolled — it is not clinical evidence and sits apart from the studies for exactly that reason. But it's a real-world signal the published trials can't capture, at a scale they never reach.

5 Tapping sessions for athletic performance in the app — sessions built with a 3× MLB All-Star for recovery and flow
6 → 3 average self-rated intensity (0-10) before and after Tapping, across 16,501 measured sessions in the app's Sports Performance collection
more than 18 million before-and-after Tapping sessions measured across the app, all conditions — one of the largest real-world datasets in digital mental wellness
Researchers: we make anonymized real-world outcome data available for qualified academic study. If you're researching Tapping for athletic performance, let's collaborate →

The studies

8 studies, strongest evidence first. Search and filter to find what you need — each card explains what the researchers did and found before giving the technical detail.

Systematic review Moderate rigor

A narrative systematic review of the effectiveness of Emotional Freedom Techniques (EFT)

Boath, E., Stewart, A., Carryer, A. · 2012

This systematic review sifted through 42 published EFT studies down to 7 qualifying randomized trials, and found tapping outperformed comparison approaches like diaphragmatic breathing, progressive muscle relaxation, an inspirational lecture, and a support group across conditions including PTSD, fibromyalgia, phobias, test anxiety, and athletic performance. The one method that beat EFT in these trials was EMDR. With only 7 RCTs reviewed and methodological flaws noted in the source studies, the reviewers still called for further quality research even while endorsing EFT's promise.

A search identified 42 published EFT studies, of which 7 RCTs met inclusion criteria; EFT was shown effective for PTSD, fibromyalgia, phobias, test anxiety, and athletic performance, and was superior to diaphragmatic breathing, progressive muscular relaxation, an inspirational lecture, and a support group, while only EMDR outperformed EFT.

👥 7 studies 📍 United Kingdom Staffordshire University, CPSI Monograph · 2012 ✓ Source-checked View study → Details & cite →
Randomized trial Moderate rigor

The Effect of EFT (Emotional Freedom Techniques) on Athletic Performance: A Randomized Controlled Blind Trial

Church, D. · 2009

Twenty-six college basketball players either did a 15-minute tapping session or a placebo activity before a simulated game situation, then had their free throws and jump height measured. The players who tapped made noticeably more free throws afterward, while the comparison group actually got worse — but jumping ability itself didn't change either way, suggesting the effect was more about composure and focus than physical performance. This is a small trial and was not found indexed on PubMed, so it should be read as a suggestive, not definitive, sports-psychology finding.

26 college basketball players received either a 15-minute EFT session or a placebo intervention before a simulated game scenario; players who received EFT improved free throw accuracy by an average of 20.8% while the placebo group's accuracy decreased by an average of 16.6%, with no significant difference between groups in vertical jump.

👥 26 people 📍 United States The Open Sports Sciences Journal · 2009 ✓ Source-checked View study → Details & cite →
Randomized trial Moderate rigor

The effect of EFT (emotional freedom techniques) on soccer performance

Llewellyn-Edwards, T., Llewellyn-Edwards, M. · 2012

Two English women's soccer teams tried a short tapping session before practicing dead-ball situations like free kicks, and the team receiving EFT scored significantly more goals than the comparison condition — echoing an earlier American study that found the same pattern with basketball free throws. The abstract doesn't report the total number of players or an exact effect size, so the magnitude of the benefit isn't fully quantifiable from what's available, but the direction replicates prior sports-performance findings.

A randomized controlled trial (with a supporting uncontrolled trial) of a short EFT session with two English ladies soccer teams found a significant improvement in goal scoring ability from dead ball situations, replicating an earlier American basketball trial.

📍 United Kingdom Fidelity: Journal for the National Council of Psychotherapy · 2012 ✓ Source-checked View study → Details & cite →
Randomized trial Preliminary

Effect of Emotional Freedom Technique (EFT) on heart rate, blood pressure and performance in national level shooters

Dwivedi, S., Sekhon, A., Chauhan, B. · 2021

Fourteen young national-level competitive shooters were randomly assigned to a 3-week EFT program or an inspirational-lecture control condition. The EFT group showed improved heart rate, blood pressure, and shooting accuracy compared to the control group. This is a very small randomized trial in a specialized athletic population, so findings should be considered preliminary despite reaching statistical significance.

Post-intervention analysis indicated significant improvements in HR (-4.62%, p=0.01), systolic BP (-3.6%, p=0.001), diastolic BP (-5.16%, p=0.004), and shooting performance (+1.21%, p=0.01) for the EFT group compared to active control.

👥 14 people 📍 India International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology · 2021 ✓ Source-checked View study → Details & cite →
Controlled trial Preliminary

Effectiveness of emotional freedom technique on competition anxiety and salivary cortisol of elite taekwondo athletes

Mollazadeh, M., Gharayagh Zandi, H., Ghorbanzadeh, B. · 2025

29 elite Iranian taekwondo athletes were split into a group that added tapping to their training and a group that trained normally. The athletes who tapped reported feeling less anxious before competition and showed lower levels of the stress hormone cortisol in their saliva, along with more self-confidence, compared to those who didn't tap. It's a small study of a very specific athletic population, so it's a useful early signal rather than a broad conclusion.

After ten EFT sessions, the intervention group showed reductions in cognitive and somatic competitive anxiety and salivary cortisol, and increased self-confidence, compared with the training-only control group.

👥 29 people 📍 Iran Sports Medicine: Research and Practice · 2025 ✓ Source-checked View study → Details & cite →
Outcome study Preliminary

Sports confidence and critical incident intensity after a brief application of Emotional Freedom Techniques: A pilot study

Church, D., Downs, D. · 2012

Ten female college athletes carrying distressing memories of past sports mistakes did a single 20-minute tapping session, and their distress ratings dropped while their confidence scores rose — and those gains were still holding two months later. Their pulse rate improvement was smaller and only bordered on statistically meaningful. With just 10 athletes and no comparison group, it's a small pilot suggesting a brief tapping session can shift how athletes carry a bad memory into competition.

In 10 female college athletes given a single 20-minute EFT session, significant post-intervention improvements were found in SUD, both emotional and physical CSIR distress, and sport confidence (p=.001), with gains maintained at 60-day follow-up; change in pulse rate was only marginally significant (p=.087).

👥 10 people 📍 United States The Sport Journal · 2012 ✓ Source-checked View study → Details & cite →
Case series Preliminary

Preliminary evidence for the treatment of type I 'yips': The efficacy of the Emotional Freedom Techniques

Rotheram, M., Maynard, I., Thomas, O. et al. · 2012

One elite golfer struggling with the 'yips' — involuntary movements that wreck a golfer's stroke — went through four two-hour tapping sessions focused on a significant past event linked to when the yips started, and improved across every measure researchers tracked, including actual putting success on the course. Because this is a single-case study, it's a proof-of-concept suggesting tapping can help this specific performance condition, not evidence it will work the same way for others.

A single elite golfer with Type I 'yips' underwent four 2-hour EFT sessions targeting a significant life event linked to the condition, and showed improvements across all dependent measures — visual yips symptoms, putting success rate, and motion analysis — that transferred to competitive play.

👥 1 people 📍 United Kingdom The Sport Psychologist · 2012 ✓ Source-checked View study → Details & cite →
Review Moderate rigor

A re-examination of Church's (2009) study into the effects of Emotional Freedom Techniques (EFT) on basketball free-throw performance

Baker, A.H. · 2010

This is a methodological re-analysis, not a new trial: a researcher went back through Church's 2009 basketball free-throw data and confirmed tapping helped, but with a twist — the tapping group's own improvement wasn't a reliable effect on its own, while the comparison group got significantly worse under pressure. So the real story was EFT preventing a performance slump rather than boosting skill outright. The reanalysis flagged a ceiling effect in the task and recommended tougher free-throw tests for future studies.

A statistical re-examination of Church's (2009) basketball free-throw data confirmed the EFT group performed relatively better than controls, driven mainly by the control group's significant performance decrement rather than a significant EFT improvement; men and women contributed about equally.

📍 United States Energy Psychology: Theory, Research, & Treatment · 2010 ✓ Source-checked View study → Details & cite →

What critics say — and what the research shows

A resource you can trust includes the criticisms too. Here they are, answered straight.

The fair criticisms

The most common critiques of the athletic performance research: some trials compare tapping to a waitlist rather than to an established treatment, and many outcomes are self-reported. Worth knowing — and the field has been steadily answering both, with a growing number of head-to-head and active-control trials.

The studies that didn't show a benefit

  • A re-examination of Church's (2009) study into the effects of Emotional Freedom Techniques — A statistical re-examination of Church's (2009) basketball free-throw data confirmed the EFT group performed relatively better than controls, driven mainly by the control group's significant performance decrement rather than a significant EFT improvement; men and women contributed about equally.

We list these right alongside the positive ones. A field confident in its evidence doesn't hide them.

Common questions

Does Tapping (EFT) work for athletic performance?

The published research is early but encouraging: 8 studies, including 4 randomized controlled trials and 1 meta-analysis or systematic review, have examined Tapping for athletic performance. Most report improvements in performance measures or reductions in performance anxiety. As with any technique, results vary by person and the strongest future studies will compare tapping directly with established treatments.

How many studies are there on Tapping for athletic performance?

This directory catalogues 8 studies of EFT/Tapping for athletic performance: 4 randomized controlled trials, 1 meta-analysis or systematic review, and the remainder pilot, outcome, and case studies — each listed with its design, sample size, and source on this page.

Is Tapping for athletic performance backed by science or is it pseudoscience?

Tapping for athletic performance is supported by peer-reviewed research published in indexed medical and psychology journals, including randomized controlled trials and meta-analyses. Critics fairly note that some trials use waitlist rather than active comparison groups and rely on self-report; the field has been steadily addressing both. The honest summary: a real and growing evidence base, not a settled one — every study, including critical findings, is listed openly on this page.